view
Abstract: Competition law seems to have a contentious relationship with non-economic considerations. In this article, we argue that democracy is a particular type of non-economic consideration that can and should inform competition law decision-making. Competition law theory developed in light of concerns that unchecked economic power could negatively impact democracy, and democratic legitimacy is key to empowering and justifying competition law decision-making in the first place. A direct concern with democracy therefore makes sense from within competition law as a discipline and from understandings of the democratic state that exist outside of competition law. With reference to two recent competition law decisions in New Zealand and India, we show that taking account of democracy is both justified and far from being controversial in practice.
Keywords: antitrust law; competition law; Competition Commission of India; democracy legitimacy; ordoliberalism; Harvard–Chicago debate; New Zealand Commerce Commission; news media; administrative state
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.cooray.1@city.ac.uk.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.