We all know that a defendant cannot avoid liability in nuisance by claiming that the plaintiff chose to acquire or build on the land knowing that it was subject to the interference constituting the nuisance. As the point is usually expressed, coming to the nuisance is no defence.1 Again, it cannot be said that an activity causing a nuisance is statutorily authorised if it only began following the grant of planning or resource consent, even if the use of that consent means that a nuisance is inevitable or highly likely. Rather, in such a case, the question whether a nuisance exists must be determined on ordinary bases, balancing the interest of one occupier in using land as he or she thinks fi t with a neighbour’s interest in the quiet enjoyment of his or her property. The interference is actionable only if it is “unreasonable”, in the sense that it exceeds what an ordinary person in the plaintiff’s position can reasonably be expected to tolerate. In making this judgment, the court takes into account the character of the neighbourhood, which may change over time in a way which leads to a reduction in the level of freedom from interference which the plaintiff can reasonably expect. If a nuisance is established, the plaintiff usually is seen as prima facie entitled to an injunction to restrain the interference, but the court has power to award damages in lieu of such injunction.
The application of all the above propositions was in issue before the UK Supreme Court in its recent decision in Lawrence v Fen Tigers Ltd. In 1975, an owner of land, acting pursuant to planning permission, constructed a stadium to be used for motor sports. In 1992, he obtained temporary planning permission to use adjoining agricultural land as a motocross track, and in 2002, following several temporary renewals, he was granted permanent permission. The conditions attached to the permissions limited the frequency and times of activities at the stadium and track, but not the level of noise. In 2006, the claimants bought a house nearby, and shortly thereafter complained about the noise. The local planning authority served abatement notices on the organisers of events at the stadium and the lessee of the
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.email@example.com.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.