The recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) in National Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers v United Kingdom1 would not, prima facie, appear to warrant a case comment, since it could be easily regarded as a relatively straightforward case, pertaining to the right to freedom of association under Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), particularly in the form of trade unions. Article 11 safeguards not only the freedom to protect the occupational interests of trade union members by industrial action, which must be permitted and made possible by the Contracting States,2 but also, as the Grand Chamber for the fi rst time clarifi ed in Demir v Turkey, 3 the right to bargain collectively and to enter into collective agreements.4 Nonetheless, at least in two aspects, Strasbourg’s decision in this case is signifi cant and worthy of a detailed comment: fi rst, this is the fi rst time the Court had to determine whether secondary industrial action is in fact covered by Article 11(1) ECHR and secondly, it scrutinized other instruments of international law dealing with this question and also relied on elements of comparative law in deciding the case. The second aspect deserves greater attention, given the nature of this journal. This case comment will examine how the court utilized other sources of international and national law in order to answer the question whether secondary industrial action falls within the scope of Article 11(1) ECHR.
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.firstname.lastname@example.org.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.