Abstract: European Union (EU) law is an academic subject that was initially taught in the United States in the 1960s without any caselaw existing. Nowadays, it is a subject dominated by highly court-centric analysis which involves studying or analysing the Court of Justice of the European Union. However, the conventional sources of EU law as a subject (caselaw, legislation, secondary literature) are increasingly studied through new empirical means. Data-based analysis of caselaw is now increasingly common. This raises the question as to how mainstream such methods will become. The distinctiveness of EU law from a methodological perspective as a relatively recent subject with a highly dominant court is signifi cant. The relationship between the past and future is a complexity at the heart of EU law, where “forwards” integration has always been central. Future-mapping EU law is argued to be understudied. EU law increasingly expands its reach now also globally. Can court-centric approaches going forward accurately capture its many new subjects and objects? The article considers how critical approaches have evolved as to EU studies. It considers how critical approaches can examine the shifting subjects and objects of EU law. The article gives an overview of the methodological state of EU law. It advocates a non-court-centric future of EU law and a focus upon interdisciplinary methodology with EU law. It also advocates critical studies of EU law.
Keywords: methodology; future-mapping; EU law; court-centric- CJEUcritical studies
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.firstname.lastname@example.org.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.