Abstract: Recognition of marriages lawfully concluded abroad has until recently been a well-established rule in most Western jurisdictions. The purpose of recognition of marriage is to respect the continuity of a civil law status validly acquired under the laws of one country and to protect the parties from the disadvantages of a legally limping marriage, ie, that of a relationship which qualifi es as a marriage in one jurisdiction but not in another. The rule of recognition is currently under reconstruction in many European States, often as a reaction to migration and refuge-based “value confl icts” and societal tensions in their own territories. For example, Sweden, Denmark, Norway and Germany have introduced rules on non-recognition of marriages, not permitted under the country’s own substantive (domestic) law. Marriages by a child, by proxy or by a man with more than one wife are prime examples. At the same time, the new rules forbidding recognition can leave scope for exceptions, which allow recognition through various legislative techniques. Primarily focussing on Sweden, this contribution argues that the reforms produce unpredictable outcomes and fall short of protecting vulnerable parties and that the alleged societal benefi ts are questionable. The role of international law and comparative law in the ongoing “reconstruction process” is a special concern.
Keywords: recognition of foreign marriages; private international law; polygamy; underage marriages; proxy marriages; human rights; Nordic States; Sweden; Germany
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.email@example.com.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.