Abstract: Traditional justice in the rural areas of South Africa is dispensed by offi cial traditional courts, where they are presided over by traditional leaders. The Black Administration Act 38 of 1927 currently makes provision for two types of courts depending on the nature of the facts before the court, viz criminal or civil. The relevant provisions in the Act stand to be repealed when the Traditional Courts Bill, currently being debated in parliament, is transformed into law, but traditional courts’ civil and criminal jurisdiction will continue in future, albeit with a few additional guarantees in accordance with natural law and the constitutional law. The ideals of justice expressed in the Bill and the parallels between ubuntu, an African concept, and other contemporary ideas such as restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence are recognisable. This contribution investigates the links between ubuntu, restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence in the context of formal traditional courts. Firstly, an overview of the legal position of traditional courts in South Africa — the past, the present and the future — is given. This is followed by a discussion of the scope and application of the notions of ubuntu, restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence and, fi nally, the plausible links between these three notions in the context of formal traditional courts in South Africa are discussed. In contrast to the punitive character of a conventional justice system that focuses on retaliation, ubuntu, restorative justice and therapeutic jurisprudence call for a more holistic approach that promotes reconciliation of everyone caught up in the justice system. All of them have one thing in common — the well-being of all individuals and communities touched by injustice in some form or other.
Keywords: traditional courts; customary courts; ubuntu; restorative justice; therapeutic jurisprudence; traditional justice; customary law; traditional leaders; legal pluralism
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.firstname.lastname@example.org.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.